View Single Post
  #3  
Old 26-02-2012, 12:34 PM
peanut123's Avatar
peanut123 peanut123 is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 556 / Power: 18
peanut123 is a name known to allpeanut123 is a name known to allpeanut123 is a name known to allpeanut123 is a name known to allpeanut123 is a name known to allpeanut123 is a name known to all
Re: Voyeur’s fantasy, victim’s nightmare

Shooting upskirts is against the law, but I believe shooting photos of cleavages is legal.

My take ( and I'm no lawyer) is that, as long as wat you shoot is clearly visible to everyone else, then it should be OK. I believe cleavages fall into that category, since they are meant to be seen by the public. No different from shooting faces or hands.


Quote:
Originally Posted by asdfghjkl View Post
Diane and Agnes (not their real names) are victims of men with a fetish for taking pictures of women without their knowledge.

One found a man aiming his mobile phone camera at her cleavage on the train and the other found a man trailing her with a small camera in a shopping centre.

In both cases, the men got away.

And many of these pictures and videos end up online.

Lawyers say victims can ask for such pictures to be removed, but it is not always possible to catch the culprits.

Read the full story in The New Paper on Sunday (Feb 26).

http://www.tnp.sg/content/voyeur%E2%...%99s-nightmare
__________________
Bonk Long and Prosper.